|
|
On-line Book ReviewYO TOMITA |
Main contributions can be classified into those discussing Bach’s works
and those investigating the background only. I shall hereby comment, however
briefly, on four of the most substantial contributions from the former,
as there is no index provided in the book.
| In the opening article ‘Musikalische Idiomatik in Bachs Darstellung
von Tod und Sterben’, Renate Steiger examines the elements of ars
moriendi (books on the art of dying well) in Bach’s cantatas, namely which
topoi were realised in Bach’s works and by what musical means the effect
is achieved. Steiger’s focuses are the following aspects: identifying those
musical elements that can be considered to be related to the text; functional
relationship with the song stanzas and chorale melody; and whether or not
the topoi of theological and pastoral address on death is realised in the
structure at the compositional level in Bach’s music. In doing so, she
discusses many cantatas: BWV 4, 8, 26-7, 31, 45, 51, 60, 68, 78, 82-3,
95, 105, 106, 124-5, 127, 131, 135, 156-8, 161, 172, 174-5.
|
|
This is followed by Albert Clement, entitled ‘Aus tieffer Noth schrei ich zu dir: Das Verhältnis von Text und Musik in Johann Sebastian Bachs Choralbearbeitung BWV 686’, examining holistically (i.e. from historical, musicological and theological perspectives) the relationship between the chorale text and Bach’s musical handling of chorale text. He takes examples from BWV 38, 55, 678 and 684.
Next is William Scheide’s ‘Theologische Überlegungen zu Bachs großem Choralvorspiel "Vater Unser im Himmelreich" (BWV 682)’, in which he examines the meaning of canons through the detailed analysis of Bach’s use of ‘figures’, and attempts to associate Bach’s philosophical thinking in music with his own life, namely the clash with Johann August Ernesti. In arguing BWV 678 and 682, Scheide quotes BWV 9, 12, 73, 114, 131, 135, 167, 225-6, 244, 889 and 992 as examples.
There are two contributions on the ‘reception’ of Bach’s music—USA (Bangert)
and Scandinavia (Svendsen). Readers interested in the litergy of
Bach’s time will find Robin Leaver’s contribution fascinating, from
which we learn how he reconstructed a service (24th Sunday after Trinity)
in Bach’s time in Leipzig. Thus despite the narrow focus given on the title
page, this conference report should appeal to many scholars, especially
those who specialised in cantatas.
| Return to the previous page |