Notes on the
contributors
Preface
Acknowledgements |
|
PART I
SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY KEYBOARD MUSIC |
|
1. |
Alexander Silbiger: 'On
Frescobaldi's recreation of the chaconne and the passacaglia' |
|
2. |
Rudolf Rasch: 'Johann Jacob
Froberger's travels 1649-1653' |
|
3. |
Pieter Dirksen: 'New
perspectives on Lynar A1' |
|
4. |
Christopher Hogwood: 'Creating
the corpus: the "Complete keyboard music" of Henry Purcell' |
|
PART II
THE EARLY EIGHTEENTH CENTURY |
|
5. |
John Butt: 'Towards a genealogy
of the keyboard concerto'. |
|
6. |
Davitt moroney: 'Couperin,
Marpurg and Roeser: a Germanic Art de Toucher le Clavecin, or a
French Wahre Art?' |
|
PART III
THE BACH FAMILY |
| 7. |
Christoph Wolff: 'Invention,
composition and the improvement of nature: apropos Bach the teacher and
practical philosopher' |
| 8. |
Peter Williams: 'Is there an
anxiety of influence discernible in J. S. Bach's Clavierübung I?' |
| 9. |
David Schulenberg: ''Towards
the most elegant taste': developments in keyboard accompaniment from J.
S. to C. P. E. Bach.' |
| 10. |
Peter Wollny: ''... welche
dem größten Concerte gleichen': the polonaises of Wilhelm Friedemann
Bach.' |
|
PART IV
THE LATER EIGHTEENTH CENTURY |
|
11. |
Menno van Delft: ''Schnellen': a
quintessential articulation technique in eighteenth-century keyboard
playing.' |
|
12. |
Robert D. Levin: 'Mozart's
non-metrical keyboard preludes.' |
|
PART V
MUSICAL ENVOI |
|
13. |
Lars Ulrik Mortensen: 'J. S.
Bach: Keyboard Partita in A minor after BWV 1004.' |
|
Index |
|
|
 |
|
should be read by everyone studying
Bach’s keyboard works |
Butt examines the background of a striking coincidence he
noticed---namely in 1707-8 Bach and Handel independently wrote their first
‘organ concertos’ (i.e. organ obbligatos in Bach’s cantata 71 ‘Gott ist mein
König’ and Handel’s oratorio ‘Il trionfo del Tempo e del Disinganno’).
Through his wide-ranging discussion touching on broader cultural issues and
nearly a dozen key figures in the history of Western music in Europe, he
concludes that it was the theory and practice of thoroughbass which gave
Bach and Handel the necessary skills and knowledge to come up with what we
now see as the birth of the keyboard concerto. One small question remains,
however, as to the case of Vivaldi’s RV 779 (p.97) how it fits into the
picture of Bach and Handel.
Moroney argues how Bach may have viewed the French approach to
harpsichord teaching. Moroney argues that the use of thumb was much more
widely practised in the French harpsichord playing, quite contrary to what
we are often told that it was Bach who was the pioneer of this performance
technique. Apart from this issue, I think his discussion on Marpurg is very
valuable, especially when we consider his promotion of Bach’s works in the
second half of the 18th century.
Wolff examines the fundamental premises of Bach’s compositional art and
its communication through his teaching methods. He does this by first
expanding his theory as to why Bach needed to make the fair copies of the
Inventions and Sinfonia and the Well-Tempered Clavier (the idea
he stated briefly in his monograph of 2000); he then explores in Bach’s
compositions the elements of imitating and perfecting of nature, a
fascinating reading of philosophical dimension, by revisiting the
Scheibe-Birnbaum controversy. This is a very well-focused, insightful essay. |