|
On-line Book ReviewYO TOMITA |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
he way we judge the performances of Bach’s works—convincing or unconvincing—depends very much on what we presently consider them stylish or otherwise. This aesthetic judgement is quite complex: while some may insist that the appreciation of music should be approached purely as natural, instinctive response to sound, the majority of others consider the music and its performance in a wider cultural and historical contexts as well. |
What I felt most valuable is the author’s objective assessment of both the musicologists’ discussions of many aspects of performance of Bach’s works and the recordings made by then considered leading performers of 1945–1975—a very comprehensive collection in itself—which are all very neatly organised and structured in the book. She of course does not limit herself strictly to this 30-year period: although the so-called ‘Bach Bow’ is absent from her discussion, she extends her argument on the other side of the chronological scale by touching on the issue of Bach’s vocal ensemble that was kindled by Rifkin in 1981.
From the perspective of research, this book will be remembered as one of the first comprehensive studies on the recorded performance. By focusing on several major works by Bach in the 30-year period immediately after the World War II, she succeeded in telling us fascinating stories from both performers and scholars of what they considered important, their mistakes and achievements, leaving lots of food for thoughts on what we may achieve in the future.